Sunday, September 28, 2014

New singles majority is bad news for Social Security

Singles are taking over the nation. For the first time, most American adults aren't married. But fewer marriages mean fewer kids and eventually, fewer taxpayers.
This may be bad news for government sponsored retirement programs. Without reform, economists predict the new singles majority will threaten funding for retiree benefits.
On the other hand, the surge in singles may help save money on welfare programs.

 
 
More than 124 million Americans, or 50.2 percent, are single, said economist Edward Yardeni, who analyzed U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data in the August jobs report. Singles include never married, widowed and divorced adults over age 16. When the government started gathering such statistics in 1976, 37.4 percent were single. It has been rising since.

Single adults reign in 27 states. How single is your state?
 
45455656
Data Source: Citylab and Martin Prosperity Institute
In the interactive map above, Louisiana, Rhode Island and New York had the highest percentage of adult singles in 2012, based on U.S. Census data-crunching by The Martin Prosperity Institute and Citylab. Utah and Idaho had the lowest percentage of singles.


A 'demographic gridlock'


If singles continue to reign, there may not be enough kids in coming decades to balance the ratio of retirees to workers, said Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research.

Bad timing, as the youngest baby boomers turn 67 in 2031, when they will qualify for full Social Security benefits. Once the country's largest generational group starts cashing in on Social Security and Medicare, there won't be enough younger workers paying taxes to replenish the system. The problem is compounded by the fact that Americans are living longer than previous generations.
Social Security will also run out in 2031 unless taxes are raised or benefits lowered, the Congressional Budget Office projects. Medicare spending is rising even faster—its main hospital fund is expected to dry up by 2030, the program's trustees wrote in their annual report. 
 
"It's a demographic gridlock," Yardeni said in a phone interview. Boomers will not want to give up their long-awaited benefits. Nor will working-age singles—burdened with record-level student debt—welcome tax hikes.

Incentives for young singles to pay into these retirement programs are low. With older generations drying up the coffers, singles expect little-to-no economic return. "It's dead weight loss. A burden," Yardeni said.

One solution is to welcome more young, tax paying immigrants into the country, Yardeni suggested.



Minorities have higher birth rates and can prevent an inverted population pyramid, a phenomenon in rapidly aging countries like Japan, where there are more old people than young. Counting on immigrants is unrealistic, he said, until Congress can reach consensus on reform.

Singles and the safety net 
 
Although the singles majority jeopardizes retirement programs' funds, they may have the opposite effect on welfare programs for the poor, said Robert Moffitt, a Johns Hopkins University economist who specializes in safety nets.


Spending on assistance for the poor will go down if the singles majority persists, he said, since most welfare programs are heavily biased toward providing benefits to families with kids.
"If you're a childless single and healthy, then you're on your own and won't qualify for most safety net programs," he said in a phone interview.

Unless eligibility rules for entitlement programs change, more singles without families and kids mean fewer adults will be able to receive welfare benefits.
 
One exception: If a majority of singles is poor, food stamps may see an increase in expenditure since it is the one program that all adults can qualify for regardless of children.

"You get an average of $5 a day for food stamps. That's all you're qualified to get if you're a poor, unemployed single," Moffitt said.

Monday, September 8, 2014

Investors fear retirement unknowns

It's common knowledge that the baby boomers are hitting retirement in droves. Every month, more than a quarter-million boomers turn 65. That's a trend with amazing economic consequences.
What many people may not realize, however, is that the boomer's retirement could last six years longer.
Oliver Rossi | Stone | Getty Images
 
Why? Since 1965, the average retirement age has dropped almost two full years, while life expectancy at age 65 has increased four years. Basically, boomers, on average, are going to live longer than any generational group.
This puts an additional financial burden on boomers and creates anxiety for Generation X and millennials. And that puts pressure on financial advisors, who need to help investors tackle the unknown and prepare for what could be a longer post-retirement life.

Better late than never

Baby boomers don't have time to plan for retirement—they are already here. Whether they are prepared or not is another story. As the last generation expected to be more successful than their parents, they may have had unrealistic expectations of their ability to save.

Alternately, they may not have been concerned about saving early in their careers. After all, their parents and grandparents fared well with pensions and social security. And then there's the recession, which wiped out retirement funds right as many boomers were about to start needing them. It's a bleak picture.



But boomers are resilient and determined. They expect solutions and will work to find them.
When working with boomers, financial professionals need to change their language from "planning for retirement" to "what are your retirement plans."
It's key to understand how these boomers wish to approach retirement—as a delayed adventure, as a well-deserved rest—and then help them see how they can accomplish that plan, or at least a version of it.
<p>Boomers boost luxury travel biz</p> <p>Matthew Upchurch, Virtuoso chairman & CEO, discusses the baby boomers' big impact on the travel industry.</p>
Boomers are success-oriented. They need to know what is possible. If their retirement savings won't get them their ultimate dream, it's essential for them to understand what they can still do to make sure things align with their core values.
As for Gen X, they are overwhelmed. They are hitting their stride in the earnings years, but spending it as fast or faster than it comes in. They are in a high-cost period of life, with homes and cars and children and tuition and 100 different ways they need to stretch their dollars.


They know they need to save more for retirement—they really do. And they have the best intentions. But we all know where that path goes.
Caught between the boomers—who may have been slightly blindsided by the change in retirement strategy over the past few decades—and millennials who don't have any faith that the system will be there to help them out, Gen X is underprepared for retirement.
"Millennials are not going to take kindly to the 'Just one Starbucks a day can make a difference' pitch."
But it's not out of misinformation. If anything, it is from information overload. The numbers just seem too much, and they suffer analysis paralysis.
To help Gen Xers get back on track for retirement, they need to focus on the time they have between now and their desired retirement age.
They are constantly comparing themselves to their peers, so a savvy financial professional needs to show them where they stack up. It's important for an advisor to use similar income levels, not average, or the Gen Xers will start discounting the advisor's stats. Encourage a snowball approach where they take a first small step and then gradually add more. In other words, make it palatable.

Of course, Gen X doesn't want to retire broke. However, they also want to enjoy today.
They are carpe diem kids and are not interested in sacrifice today for return tomorrow. The key is for advisors to turn the conversation around and show the Gen Xers how they can get what they want in retirement without having to feel like they are missing out on today.

No time like the present

Millennials are lucky in that they have plenty of time to think about retirement. This generation of savers also have no delusions of anyone helping them out. This combination would be an ideal audience for retirement planning, except for millennials' staggering student loan debt and their consumer-focused approach to life.

But millennials are also optimistic by nature. They want to make smart decisions and own their lives and their choices. The smart financial advisor will tap into that energy and show these young investors how small contributions today can give them greater freedom tomorrow.

Be aware, however, that millennials are not going to take kindly to the "Just one Starbucks a day can make a difference" pitch.
That $4 luxury feels like a birthright. Instead, an advisor should suggest they apply half of each year's raise or bonus toward retirement—it's money they weren't spending, and they have time to let those smaller contributions grow.

It's essential that these young investors develop good saving habits early.
—By Cam Marston, special to CNBC.com. Marston is president of Generational Insights and author of "Motivating the 'What's In It for Me?' Workforce" and "Generational Insights."

Monday, August 25, 2014

Why the 'Made in China' model is weakening

Why the 'Made in China' model is weakening

Why the 'Made in China' model is weakening
Workers in a clothing factory in Bozhou, Anhui province, China.
AFP | Getty Images
 Workers in a clothing factory in Bozhou, Anhui province, China. 
China—a low-cost maker of goods—is falling behind in the global manufacturing race as rising wages and energy costs put pressure on the Asian country, synonymous with making super cheap stuff.
 
China is among several economies whose manufacturing price advantage over the U.S. is eroding, according to new data released Tuesday from The Boston Consulting Group. Other countries that are becoming less cost competitive include Brazil, Russia, the Czech Republic and Poland.
On the flip side, moderate wage growth and lower energy prices are making the U.S. and Mexico more desirable manufacturing destinations. The upshot? More U.S. businesses are likely to produce goods closer to home in the coming years.

"This means companies will start to move manufacturing out of those expensive countries if they can, to cheaper countries like the U.S.," said Hal Sirkin, a senior partner at The Boston Consulting Group.
Recent U.S. government data show similar gains. Industrial production increased 0.4 percent in July for its sixth-consecutive monthly gain, the Federal Reserve reported last week. Manufacturing output advanced 1 percent in July, its largest increase since February.


"It used to be a simple rule: Manufacturing is cheaper in Asia and South America," Sirkin said. "But it's fundamentally changed."

Less 'Made in China'

While thousands of U.S. manufacturing jobs that were lost to overseas production won't be recovered overnight, the landscape is changing. And the manufacturing shifts are especially dramatic in China.
Wages in the most populous nation are soaring. By comparison, Mexican manufacturing labor in 2000 was roughly twice as expensive as in China. But since 2004, Chinese wages have grown nearly five fold, and Mexican wages have risen by only 67 percent—less than 50 percent in dollar terms.
Higher energy costs also are dampening China's manufacturing prowess. The cost of industrial electricity rose by about 66 percent in China and 132 percent in Russia. The cost of natural gas soared by about 138 percent in China and 202 percent in Russia from 2004 to 2014, according to Boston Consulting research.
 
While Russia is a key exporter of natural gas, higher production of U.S. shale gas has pushed U.S. energy prices down sharply. Russia, meanwhile, still relies on conventional natural gas, which has become more expensive.
 
According to Boston Consulting's global manufacturing cost-competitive index—with the U.S. pegged at 100—China came in at 96 this year. In other words, it's 4 percent more expensive to manufacture in America versus China. China's reading used to be lower in the 80s, which means the cost of making goods in the U.S. compared to China has since narrowed.
"We see China as getting much more expensive," said Sirkin, co-author of several reports on the shifting economics of global manufacturing.

The case for American manufacturing

If manufacturing in China is getting dicier, the prospects for the U.S. and Mexico are improving. And cheaper energy prices are a key reason why.
 
Natural gas prices have fallen by 25 to 35 percent since 2004 in North America due to large-scale production of shale. Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, forces natural gas and crude oil out of shale buried deep below the earth by using highly pressurized and treated water.
U.S. wage growth also has been slow. The current hourly, federal minimum wage is $7.25. Efforts to raise the federal minimum to $10.10 an hour, if passed, would affect the service industry.

Most manufacturing jobs, though, already are in the range of $10 to $15 an hour and would not be impacted by a federal wage change.

Brillo: 'Made in the USA'


Source: Armaly Brands
But as any business owner will explain, wages and energy costs aren't the only factors.
Logistics and the overall ease of doing business can influence potential manufacturing locations. For example, Armaly Brands' Brillo steel wool soap pad has never outsourced production or its labor overseas, and Brillo products are made in Michigan and Ohio. Armaly Brands employs about 125 people at two manufacturing plants, with plans for a third location in Michigan.
While manufacturing costs may have been cheaper in Asia in prior years, duplicating the company's synthetic sponge technology overseas would have been difficult. Keeping manufacturing local also makes inventory management easier and provides flexibility, said John Armaly, chief executive officer of Armaly Brands, based in Walled Lake, Michigan.
And domestic production means better quality control. "The quality of some of the products made overseas is not the same as we produce in the states," Armaly said.

Tipping-point industries

As businesses continue to recalculate the costs of manufacturing in China, some industries are forecast to reach a tipping point in around five years and begin shifting manufacturing to the U.S., according to a Boston Consulting report released in 2012.
Those sectors include computers and electronics; appliances and electrical equipment; furniture; and transportation goods such as truck components and bicycles. These industries have relatively low labor cost components and high transportation related costs so they likely would return to the U.S. first.
—By CNBC's Heesun Wee.

Friday, August 22, 2014

Oh, Just a very short list of taxes....

Overall, we are now being taxed at a higher rate than when we threw tea into the harbor, with no end of increases in sight. Now include the understanding of the demographics of our nation, and that light at the end of the tunnel is not a ray of sunshine, but a train coming our way and we’re on the tracks.
  • FEDERAL INCOME TAX
  • SOCIAL SECURITY TAX
  • STATE TAX
  • CITY TAX
  • COUNTY TAX
  • PROPERTY TAX
  • PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX
  • SCHOOL TAX
  • LONG CAPITAL GAINS TAX
  • SHORT CAPITAL GAINS TAX
  • SALES TAX
  • ESTATE TAX
  • GASOLINE TAX
  • WATER TAX
  • SEWER TAX
  • TAX ON ENERGY – GAS, ELECTRIC, HEATING OIL
  • BUSINESS TAX
  • AIRPORT TAX
  • TELEPHONE TAX
  • LICENSE PLATE TAX
  • HOTEL TAX
  • CABLE TV TAX
  • USER TAXES
  • UNEMPLOYMENT TAX
  • WORKERS COMP. TAX
  • 100’S OF REGULATORY FEES
  • CIGARETTE TAX
  • CORPORATE INCOME TAX
  • INHERITANCE TAX
  • ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE TAX
  • INVENTORY TAX
  • MARRIAGE LICENSE TAX
  • LIQUOR TAX
  • BUILDING PERMIT TAX
  • MEDICARE TAX
  • FISHING LICENSE TAX
  • REAL ESTATE TAX
  • FOOD LICENSE TAX
  • FUEL PERMIT TAX
  • HUNTING LICENSE TAX
  • ROAD USAGE TAX (TRUCKERS)
  • LUXURY TAX
  • RECREATIONAL VEHICLE TAX
  • UTILITY TAX
  • SEPTIC PERMIT TAX
  • WELL PERMIT TAX
  • ROAD TOLL BOOTH TAX
  • VEHICLE SALES TAX WORKERS COMPENSATION TAX
  • TRAILER REGISTRATION TAX
  • WATERCRAFT REGISTRATION TAX
  • LONG TERM CAPITAL GAINS TAX
  • SHORT TERM CAPITAL GAINS TAX
  • TELEPHONE FEDERAL EXCISE TAX
  • TELEPHONE STATE AND LOCAL TAX
  • TELEPHONE USAGE CHARGE TAX
  • TELEPHONE FEDERAL UNIVERSAL SERVICE FEE TAX
 ©2012 Wealth & Wisdom Institute.

Monday, August 18, 2014

Three lessons to teach your kids about money


The shopping spree may start months, weeks or maybe the day before the school year begins.
Buying a dozen pencils and a few Trapper Keepers won't cut it for today's students. The back-to-school buying binge may include trendy new clothes, shoes, sneakers, in addition to hefty expenses for extracurricular activities.

For older kids, a new laptop, tablet or mobile phone may now be essential. It all adds up fast! According to a recent survey by RetailMeNot and The Omnibus Company, parents spend nearly $660 a year on school-related costs for their family.



But spending on your kids can offer some practical lessons that you can use to teach about money.
Only 17 states require students to take a personal finance course before they graduate from high school, according to the Council for Economic Education. The responsibility of teaching kids how to manage, grow and protect their money often falls on parents.
No matter how old your child is, here are three key lessons that you should teach them as they head back to school.


Wait before you buy 


Stress to your kids the value of delayed gratification. My daughter was six when she first started saving regularly in her piggy bank, but even a preschooler can learn to wait until they've saved enough money—in a special "savings" jar or piggy bank—to buy a toy or treat they want.
Also show them how much they could save if they wait until an item goes on sale. You might explain to your child that you only have money to buy essential classroom supplies right now, but by December you'll have enough money to buy him a new laptop after the holidays when they are on sale.

Compare prices before you buy

Jamie Grill | Blend Images | Getty Images
 
Shopping around before you buy is a great way to get the best deal and save money. I'm always comparison shopping—whether it's for groceries or a new refrigerator—and I often bring my kids along on the trip or show them the items that I am thinking of buying online. And it's rubbed off.
Every Christmas, my son and daughter leave a "Wish List" of gifts they'd like from Santa in their stocking at the fireplace. Last year, my son added some extra information about the items on his "Wish List" for Christmas. He included the best price he found online for the tablet, videogames and sneakers and the name of the retailer.

I also showed my 12-year-old son, who loves basketball, how to look on coupon websites to find discounts and deals at retailers for his favorite sneakers or sports gear.


Now, he always tells me how much I'm "saving" if I buy him a discounted pair of shoes or clothing he's selected.

Remember a credit card is like a loan
 
Get out of the habit of pulling out plastic for every purchase. Using cash and figuring out the change is a terrific math lesson for younger kids. Explain to them using a credit card is like taking out a loan to make that purchase, and you need to borrow wisely. You need to make sure you can afford that new pair of jeans or iPhone before you buy it.
Let them know that credit cards can wreck finances. Rates on some store credit cards can top 20 percent, raising the price of that purchase significantly if you don't pay off the entire balance on time.
For your high school student who may want their own credit card, start them off with a debit or prepaid card that you can monitor first. Once you co-sign for them to get a real credit card, remember that if your kid doesn't pay the bill, it will hurt your credit score too.

—By CNBC's Sharon Epperson

Sunday, March 16, 2014

US poised to become world's only superpower

Published: Wednesday, 12 Mar 2014 | 1:26 PM ET
By: Ron Insana














The U.S. is poised to become the sole economic superpower in the world.
I call it "Fortress America."

I've been traveling around the U.S. for the past 18 months and have noticed enormous changes. They're not driven by the Federal Reserve's easy money policies, although many of the positive changes taking place in energy, manufacturing, technology and retail sales could not have happened if the Fed, namely Ben Bernanke, had not saved the economy from another Great Depression.
Getty Images
A gas flare is seen at an oil well site on July 26, 2013 outside Williston, North Dakota.
I was happy to find, on Sunday, as I moderated a panel of top performing hedge-fund managers that, they too, see good things for the U.S. in the years ahead.

I base my outlook on four legs of an economic stool:

* The energy revolution
* A manufacturing renaissance here at home
* Rapid technological innovation
* A major recovery in residential real estate

Many of these factors are beginning to get the appropriate recognition for their contribution to a more durable, sturdy and long-lasting economic expansion, which, I believe, will also be supported by a secular bull market in U.S. stocks.

I believe the current period to be analogous to 1949 to 1968, when the U.S. was winding down government spending in the post-World War II environment … one in which the government got smaller, but the private sector, ripe, and rife, with new innovations, pent-up consumer demand and manufacturing excellence drove the economy into a pre-eminent position in the world economy.
In both relative, and absolute terms, the U.S. economy is gaining supremacy in its competitive, and comparative, economic advantages.

The energy revolution is making the U.S. economy energy self-sufficient and bringing down the cost of manufacturing so much that U.S. companies are bringing jobs back home and enticing foreign firms, particularly, auto, chemical and petrochemical companies to come here to benefit from cheaper energy costs and a more competitive, flexible and educated American work force.
The U.S. is now the largest producer of natural gas in the world, thanks to fracking and horizontal drilling technologies.

In 2020, the U.S. is projected to overtake Saudi Arabia and Russia as the world's largest producer of crude oil and will likely be a net exporter of both crude and refined energy products, turning our current trade and balance of payments deficits into surpluses. (The situation in Ukraine will likely hasten approval of new licenses to export liquified natural gas (LNG) and even crude oil itself.)
Over 600,000 jobs have been created in the sector, with many more to come.
For the first time in over six decades, the U.S. is a net exporter of refined energy products already.

That energy revolution, the nation's second in about 150 years, is leading to radical changes in the manufacturing platform that globalization gutted in the last 40 years.
With 3.8 million open jobs in the U.S., many in advanced manufacturing, the U.S. middle class may be re-built, as high-paying, high value-added jobs are there for the taking, especially for those worker who have the requisite software and robotics training necessary on today's factory floor.

3-D printing is revolutionizing manufacturing and health care, changes that will lead to be a better economic quality of life and longer and better lives for the average American who, some experts say, will also benefit from lower healthcare costs, thanks to the benefit of technological advances.
The recovery in real estate, though it slowed recently, will re-accelerate as millennials form households and start their own families. True, we may never see a real-estate boom like the one we witnessed in the last decade. But, like the baby-boom period, we may also see a steady and prolonged bull market in real estate as the 100-million strong cohort takes its place as a drive of economic growth in the decades ahead.

I was quite heartened to hear that four top hedge fund managers, that I spoke with over the weekend (event and manager names withheld since it was a private event), largely agreed that the U.S. remains the best place in the world in which to invest, even if you would like overseas exposure.
U.S. multinationals are best poised to profit from overseas growth. Brazil, Russia, India and China will continue to disappoint investors, they say, while emerging markets, from Turkey to Thailand and from Australia to Argentina, have too many troubles to be good investments, for now.

True, U.S. stocks could suffer a meaningful 10 to 20 percent correction this year, amid geopolitical turmoil, shifting monetary policy in the U.S., UK and elsewhere, and simply take a break after a 170-percent advance after a five year bull-run, the pullback, they say will offer a significant buying opportunity to benefit from the next leg in a secular bull market.

Glad to know I am not alone in my thinking. For those asking, "what do I do now," if I missed the big rally so far? Get your pencils out, pick the stocks you like and buy 'em when their down, but in this scenario, they are certainly not out!

— By Ron Insana
Ron Insana is a CNBC and MSNBC contributor and the author of four books on Wall Street. He also delivers a daily podcast, "Insana Insights," and a long-form weekly version, both available on iTunes and at roninsana.com. Follow him on Twitter @rinsana.