Monday, September 9, 2013

Crowdfunding college and other clever ways to cut costs...

Published: Friday, 30 Aug 2013 | 12:19 PM ET

By: | CNBC Reporter

With the cost of a college education increasing at a pace roughly double the pace of inflation, students are looking at new ways to pay for their degrees, cut the costs of classes in innovative ways and maximize alumni connections after graduation to jumpstart their careers.


Teaching online could cut the bottom line of a college education 

Imagine being able to cut the cost of a college education by a third. The University at Albany, The State University of New York, said it might be possible using MOOCs—massive open online courses.
The SUNY System is one of a small but growing number of universities and university systems adding MOOCs to their course lineup. Online courses have been around for years, but improvements in interactive technology, a tech-savvy generation and a desire by schools to keep costs under control, all appear to be coming together to form an inflection point for their use.
Like the SUNY System, San Jose State University sees potential to reach more students using MOOCs.

"So right now we have a tremendous amount of trouble meeting a demand we have," said SJSU professor Ron Rogers. "And so these courses are a potential way for us to allow access to students."


The school recently completed a pilot program, offering five MOOCs through the online platform Udacity. The courses are designed and monitored by SJSU professors. They are open to far more students than a class taught on campus, so students will not have to wait a semester or two for a place in a required class, helping to keep them on track to graduate in four years. The classes also cost a lot less.

Incoming freshman Harriet Kansiime took a MOOC over the summer to fulfill a SJSU math requirement. It cost her $150, far less than the $1,700 it would have cost her to take it on campus.
"First of all, the cost of having to travel to San Jose State every day, that saved me a lot of money," Kansiime said of the gas savings. "And I was able to study at my own pace."
While MOOCs are traditionally free online, the colleges that are using, or experimenting with them, note there will be a cost if a student wants credit for taking these courses. Colleges will charge fees to transfer credits and the professors who monitor students and give tests need to be paid as well.
Right now, SJSU feels MOOCs are best used to teach courses in certain disciplines.
"I think courses in science, technology, math and engineering are easier initially to transition to this type of online setting," said Rogers. "But it really depends on the instructor, what they are willing to try and how innovative people want to be."

While critics say MOOCs cannot replace the traditional college experience, folding them into a curriculum means a college may be able to reach more of its own students, and others looking to take a class at a lower cost.
Finding a helping hand in a crowd
Eighty-five percent of Americans still find value in obtaining a college degree, according to a recent study by Sallie Mae, though families are contributing a smaller portion of their savings to paying for a child's higher education.
As a result, some students are looking for financial help from the crowd, or more specifically crowdfunding.

"I raised $20,000," said Jennifer Schoolcraft, a student at Roosevelt University. Schoolcraft will use the money to pay for her bachelor's degree in sociology, after which she plans to go to graduate school to become an occupational therapist.
"In exchange for that $20,000, after I graduate from school and am employed, a certain percentage of my income is taken out and gets delivered back to backers," said Schoolcraft.
Schoolcraft found her backers through Pave, an online crowdfunding platform linking investors with approved applicants. The investors are interested in putting their money to work in people, rather than products or companies, according to Pave co-founder Justin Mitchell.


With Pave, it's not a loan, it's an investment. The graduating students will always pay a percentage of their incomes for 10 years, regardless of their salaries. If the graduate lands a high-paying job, the investors may get back much more than they invested.


"It's a brand-new idea and we didn't know what the uptake would be," Mitchell said of the December launch. "Roughly 4,000 prospects have expressed interest so far and perhaps 1,000 people have expressed interest in becoming a backer."
Here is how Pave works: A person submits an application telling their story and outlining why they need the money and how they will use it. Pave approves the application and puts it online for potential backers to see. The backers then decide if they want to invest, and how much they want to invest.

If the applicant is a student, six months after graduating they start returning a negotiated percentage of their income to the backers. The percentage will vary based on things such as loan size and the applicant's profession, though it can never exceed 10 percent of their income. The payments continue for 10 years.

"This aligns interests entirely between backers and prospects," said Mitchell. "The better a prospect does, the better a backer ends up doing."

If a prospect does really well, and they payback more than five times the original investment in less than 10 years, they can negotiate a release from the agreement. Pave does not expect this to happen often, instead estimating investors will likely receive annual returns ranging from 5 to 8 percent on their investment.


The risk for backers is that they might never get back all of their original investment.

Pave makes its money taking 3 percent of the original investment and charging an annual service fee of 1.5 percent. The company will work with the applicant over time to make sure they are able to, and are making the payments.

Founded in 2012, Pave has funded 19 people so far. Mitchell said roughly half of them are students looking to fund an education, or pay down student debt, suggesting in a time of skyrocketing tuition, it might take a crowd, not a village, to help a student get a college degree.
Angel alumni give wings to start-ups

Fidelity Investment's former investment whiz Peter Lynch, used to tell people, "invest in what you know." These days a growing number of alumni are doing just that, investing in companies started by students and graduates of their alma maters.

"If you go to college campuses nowadays it is remarkable the level of entrepreneurial activity happening there," said Pavan Nigam, co-founder of the medical website WebMD and currently the founding partner of the venture firm Inspovation Ventures.
He is also a graduate of the University of Wisconsin and the founder of the Silicon Valley Badgers, a group of Wisconsin alumni who mentor currents students and sometimes fund the students' ideas.

Nigam said the bond provided by a common college experience can be key to maintaining a good working relationship between an entrepreneur and their investors.
Hill Street Studios | Blend Images | Getty Images
 
"Generally investors like to invest in people who are like, maybe one or two degrees of separation max away from them," said Nigam. "Because they can know them, they can validate them, they can have people vouch for them."

The Angel Capital Association estimates there are about 50 alumni angel groups across the country with ties to schools ranging from Harvard, to the University of Hawaii, to Marquette, to the University of Missouri
Nigam maintains the angel alumni groups work best for schools with a lot of school spirit, and those with strong entrepreneurial, math, science and computer programs. Schools like Wisconsin, Northwestern, Duke and Notre Dame
Baylor University also is one of those schools. Graduate David Grubbs turned to the Baylor Angel Network this year when his firm Vendevor needed a critical round of funding.

"Having the university connection plays a big role in fundraising, you have an instant connection with the investors," he said. "And so they are looking to do anything they can to help the university and we are a viable investment and we are coming out of Baylor—those are two great things for them to really get behind and help.
Vendevor is a plug-in payment processing platform. For a range of fees it allows small and medium-size businesses to quickly set up their own e-commerce sites.



This spring, Grubbs and his co-founders, two other recent Baylor graduates, submitted their business plan to the network, a group of alumni looking to invest in start-ups. They were one of four companies selected from a pool of 20 to 40 applicants.
After Vendevor presented at the "Angel Breakfast," the network did six weeks of due diligence on the company trying to poke holes in Vendevor's thesis. Once due diligence was completed the network and Vendevor took two weeks to negotiate the terms of what eventually was a purchase of preferred stock.
Grubbs plans to use the proceeds from the sale to hire a graphic artist, another staff employee and for marketing. It is an investment he believes will help expand revenue from around six figures this year to close to seven figures by year-end 2014.

There is another benefit in reaching out to alumni, Grubbs said their assistance goes beyond just a monetary investment.

"As we start to grow, we are looking for strategic partners, we are looking for people who may want to potentially acquire us," he said. "And that network really comes behind us and helps to push us along.

—By CNBC's Mary Thompson.

Monday, August 19, 2013

Stars aligned for 'serious' US correction, analyst says

Stars aligned for 'serious' US correction, analyst says

Published: Tuesday, 13 Aug 2013 | 1:43 AM ET
 
By: | Writer for CNBC.com















 
Monday, 12 Aug 2013 | 6:15 PM ET 
 
Jack Bouroudjian, Bull and Bear Partners CEO, says there is no reason for the U.S. Fed to begin tapering now, and explains why he is concerned about the market for the next couple of month.
As U.S. stocks ease back from record highs this week, more and more traders see the S&P 500 as overvalued and are pricing in a "serious correction."

Jack Bouroudjian, CEO of financial services holding company Bull and Bear Partners, told CNBC's Asia Squawk Box on Tuesday he was the most bearish he has ever been on the U.S. stock market.
"The market is overvalued and we've hit an inflection point. Unless we see some real strong growth numbers coming out of the economy, I'm looking at a 10 percent correction between now and October. It's time to be very defensive," he said.
Bouroudjian said the market's notional value has become vastly inflated versus the country's total gross domestic product on a historical basis, which is a red flag and could herald an imminent correction.


"Equities have historically traded at a discount to GDP except for two times in the last 50 years," he said. "In the late 1990's we traded at 148 percent over GDP, and in 2007 we traded at 118 percent over. Unfortunately, both times were followed by a serious correction. We are now at 110 percent."
"The time has come to say that the 'easy' money in equities might be behind us unless we see real growth in the GDP numbers and forecasts increase for top line revenue from corporate America over the next couple years," he added.

Top 4 stocks to weather a pullback
 
Four energy companies are the best way to get through a short-term stock market dip, Don Hodges of Hodges Capital Management says.
Bouroudjian's comments underscore the cautious tone surrounding the U.S. stock market that has emerged recently, as industry watchers start to doubt just how long the good times can last. Wall Street traders have also flagged several occurrences of the 'Hindenburg Omen' in the past few weeks, a technical indicator which predicts the potential of a financial market crash.


The S&P 500 index is up over 18 percent since the start of the year, boosted by more signs of an economic recovery, particularly in the housing market and employment, although it has in the past week eased from record highs seen earlier in the month, due to thin summer trading volumes and continued worries over Fed tapering.

According to Bouroudjian, another trigger point for a market correction could be the appointment of a new Federal Reserve chairman after Ben Bernanke's term expires in January.
"Twice in my investment lifetime, we have changed the Fed chairman. We changed it when (Paul) Volcker changed to (Alan) Greenspan (in 1987) and when Greenspan changed to Bernanke (in 2006). Both times were followed by a serious correction in the market," he said.


"I'm not saying it will happen again for a third time but I am very defensive because of that too," he added.
—By CNBC's Katie Holliday: Follow her on Twitter

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Insider Trading in DC Just Got Easier

Insider Trading in DC Just Got Easier


Published: Tuesday, 16 Apr 2013 | 10:55 PM ET
By: Senior Editor, CNBC.com



Twitter

108



LinkedIn

7


Share

Getty Images
 
The Capitol Building in Washington D.C.
 
While almost no one was looking, a law making it easier for congressional and top executive branch staffers to engage in corrupt trading was signed into law Monday.

The law is a modification of the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act. The modification was passed by unanimous consent by the House and the Senate last week with no debate or even discussion.

The STOCK Act, which became law just a year ago, was designed to discourage insider trading by members of Congress and top government officials. In addition to outlawing trading based on non-public information gleaned by government officials during the course of their public duties, the law required extensive disclosure of financial holdings by Congressional staffers and 28,000 senior executive branch employees.

The financial disclosures of these officials were to be posted in an online database open to the public.
The disclosure requirements were an important part of the law. They would have allowed researchers to detect abnormally successful trading activity by unelected senior government staffers—just as similar disclosure requirements for Congressmen and Senators had allowed scholars to produce evidence that suggested members of Congress were benefiting from non-public information.

Currently, although the reports of staff financial positions are officially part of the public record, they aren't readily available. Often they have to be requested from individual agencies using the names of the individuals about whom information is sought. The result is that the public is effectively blocked from learning the information disclosed in the reports.
The public disclosure requirement was arguably too lax to begin with. There's good reason to prohibit trading by senior government officials altogether. Many lawyers, journalists and Wall Streeters who come into possession of sensitive, confidential information as part of their professional lives are barred from any short term trading. Some are barred from owning individual securities at all, allowed to own nothing but index and mutual funds.


The provision of the Stock Act was a compromise in which government officials were required to disclose trades to the public in exchange for being able to trade in the first place. If disclosure proved too burdensome, government officials could simply adopt personal no-trading policies and avoid the cost of disclosing trades altogether.


The new law scraps the disclosure requirements for the staffers, leaving them in place only for members of Congress, Congressional candidates, and the President and Vice President.

People who lament our bitterly divided political situation might want to reflect what bipartisanship and inter-branch government agreement has been able to so quickly accomplish here.

Original CNBC article:

www.robertcfay.com

Friday, February 8, 2013

Even Brief Spending Cuts Could Hit US Economy Hard

Even Brief Spending Cuts Could Hit US Economy Hard

















Darren Mower | Vetta | Getty Images
 
The U.S. economy could take a big hit from automatic government spending cuts even if Congress only leaves them in place for a month or two.
The cuts were meant to be so painful that they would force Congress to find a more thoughtful way to tighten the budget.
But many analysts assume they will take effect as scheduled, forcing federal offices to furlough some of their 2.8 million workers and trim spending on everything from paper clips to missiles.
It is anyone's guess, however, how long lawmakers will be able to stomach the economic pain. The duration of the austerity measures will determine the force of the blow to the economy. Some analysts think having the cuts in place for more than a few months could trigger a brief recession.

Read More of the CNBC article: http://www.cnbc.com/id/100441227/

Friday, January 25, 2013

Unemployment to Hit Record High in 2013: ILO

Unemployment to Hit Record High in 2013: ILO

  
  Published: Tuesday, 22 Jan 2013 | 12:00 AM ET
















World unemployment could top record levels this year and continue rising until 2017, the International Labour Organization (ILO) said on Tuesday in its annual employment report.
2009 currently stands as the worst recorded year for world unemployment, with 198 million people across the globe without work.

In its 2013 Global Employment Trends report, the ILO forecasts unemployment numbers will rise by 5.1 million in 2013 to reach 202 million, topping 2009's record.  The report also predicts unemployment will rise further in 2014 to reach 205 million."Unemployment remains as dire as it was during the crisis in 2009," Ekkehard Ernst, chief of the employment trends unit at the ILO, which wrote the report, told CNBC.

While the crisis may have originated in the developed world, the report noted that 75 percent of 2012's newly unemployed came from outside it, with East Asia, South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa being the worst affected.

Ernst attributed this to the "spillover effect" of weak growth in advanced economies, and in particular, the recession in Europe.  "The main transmission mechanism of global spillovers has been through international trade, but regions such as Latin America and the Caribbean have also suffered from increased volatility of international capital flows," the report said.  It also blamed incoherence between monetary and fiscal policies and a "piecemeal approach to financial sector and sovereign debt problems, in particular in the euro area."

"The indecision of policy makers in several countries has led to uncertainty about future conditions, and reinforced corporate tendencies to increase cash holdings or pay dividends, rather than expand capacity and hire new workers," the report said.

Ernst added that labor markets can lag other economic indicators, meaning they might not reflect recent upturns in the world economy.  "Labor markets reflect what has happened in the last year… it takes some time for improvement in output to be reflected," Ernst said.

In addition, the ILO is recording rising numbers of people who choose not to search for jobs because they think the situation is hopeless. These people, officially classified as discouraged workers, may choose instead to rely on a partner's earnings or claim welfare benefits, if available.   "The labor market situation has been so bad for so long, discouragement has grown out of proportion," he said.
Despite the gloomy forecast from ILO, some people see a turnaround for the global economy. Pimco CEO and co-CIO Mohamed El-Erian said the world economy could be nearing the end of its "new normal" of high unemployment and slow growth.

"We said in 2009: three to five years," El-Erian told CNBC on Thursday, referring to how long the phenomenon of "new normal" might last. El-Erian coined the term in 2009.

 -By CNBC's Katy Barnato

Friday, January 11, 2013

Think Only the Rich Will Pay More Taxes? You're Wrong


 

Think Only the Rich Will Pay More Taxes? You're Wrong
 
Because neither the Democrats nor the Republicans wanted to defend it, the temporary payroll tax cut enacted under Obama died at the end of 2012, which means that everyone in the country will see a bigger tax bite out of their paychecks this year.


You followed all of the debate over the fiscal cliff and were relieved to hear that taxes were only going up for the rich this year.
Well, you were wrong.
Because neither party wanted to defend it, the temporary payroll tax cut enacted under Obama died at the end of 2012, which means that everyone in the country will see a bigger tax bite out of their paychecks this year. So when you get your first check of the year, look at the amount charged under "FICA" – you're going to be paying more than you did in December.
How big a bite is it? For many middle class workers, it will work out to a trip to the grocery store or a tank of gas less every two weeks this year.
Here are the numbers.
For a single person making $60,000 per year who's paid bi-weekly, gross income in a paycheck is $2,307.69.
In December, you would have had to subtract from that federal withholding taxes of $403. 56. FICA taxes were $96.93. Medicare was $33.46. State withholding for a person living in Maryland was $177.35.
That gives the taxpayer net pay in one check in December of $1,596.39.
So what happens this month?
Gross pay is the same, as are the Medicare and state taxes. But FICA taxes go up sharply – to $143.08. That's a $46.15 bite from the political decision to allow the payroll tax cut to expire.
But here's the good news – federal withholding from this paycheck are down by about 4 bucks, to $399.18, due to the way the federal government calculates inflation.
That gives our taxpayer net pay of $1,554.62, or $41.77 less than he or she made for each paycheck in December. And that's money that could have gone to that bag of groceries or tank of gas.
 Read More: http://www.cnbc.com/id/100372837/

Monday, January 7, 2013

CNBC.com Article: Boomers Stand to Benefit Most from Health-Care Act



Boomers Stand to Benefit Most from Health-Care Act
Hit hardest by unemployment, shrinking nest eggs and rising health care costs, the Baby Boom generation will be the main beneficiaries of the Affordable Care Act, according to experts.


With the presidential election and Supreme Court decision behind us, the federal government is moving forward with the Affordable Care Act. Baby Boomers stand to gain the most.
Since the recession, Boomers have been hard hit by unemployment, shrinking nest eggs and rising health care costs. During those years, about 8.6 million Boomers were without health insurance, according to a special 2009 report by Commonwealth Fund.
As the Boomer generation approaches retirement, many hope that the health care law will fill the void. "It is a game changer," says Ron Fontanetta, a health care group practice leader at Towers Watson. "It will provide health care access to pre-65 retirees in a very significant way."
Retirees who have not reached age 65 are more at risk -- they don't qualify for Medicaid, and if their former employers don't offer retiree health benefits, they will not have a group discount.
Also, it doesn't take much for a health insurance company to say that they have a pre-existing condition and deny them coverage, says Paul Fronstin, head of health benefits research at EBRI. Even if Boomer retirees can get a private health insurance plan, it will be very costly.
Based on their age alone, Boomers have to pay prices that are five to seven times higher than younger Americans, according to AARP. But if early retirees can wait until the ACA takes effect, it will change the playing field, says Fronstin.
-- Beginning in 2014, the law is supposed to prevent insurers from denying coverage to those who have a pre-existing condition. On Nov. 20, the Obama administration said that it was moving forward to implement provisions to ban discrimination and protect consumers from possible insurance abuses.
--The ACA also will do away with lifetime and annual dollar limits on benefits, and it will limit the age rating so that a Boomer can only pay three times as much as younger person.
--Health insurance will not necessarily be less costly. It will be operated by state health insurance exchanges, which will offer a competitive private health insurance market that should provide one-stop shopping.


 Read More: http://www.cnbc.com/id/100343188/